Quality Review

Quality Review

The USFDA requires that the quality standards of each drug product must be evaluated at least once a year. Other regulatory bodies have similar requirements and these can be met through the performance of an annual Quality Review.


An annual product quality review is the evaluation of a given product’s quality to verify that the existing processes used in its manufacture are consistently producing the desired quality product. This helps to ensure that current specifications for that drug product are adequate; the trends revealed by the data also provide insights for any changes to be introduced in either the manufacturing or control procedures or in the product specifications.


A representative number of batches must be selected, and a review must be done of the documents associated with them to check for adherence to specifications. Both approved and rejected batches must be a part of this study. Along with this, it is also important to evaluate any complaints received regarding the same product batches, or any returns or recalls that have been associated with those batches.


By doing these activities, it is possible to find areas where improvement is necessary. When such improvements are introduced into the next batch being manufactured, it leads to a process that is better capable of manufacturing products of the desired quality.


The quality review includes:


• Starting materials

• Packaging materials

• Critical in-process controls

• Critical equipment qualifications

• Finished product test results

• Stability studies

• Change control procedures

• CAPA effectiveness

• Returns/recalls

• Market complaints

• Deviations/non-conformances

• Failed batches

• Previous batches review


Typically, in a quality review, historical data from batches of a particular product manufactured over the past 12 months is reviewed and analyzed using statistical techniques. This helps to assess if the process is in control or not and if any changes are necessary. Based on the results of the review, re-validation or CAPA may be undertaken.


Following a review of all relevant headings, the higher management must highlight the major observations made, and arrive at conclusions regarding quality improvement. The inferences drawn must result in appropriate recommendations on any corrective actions that may be necessary such as a formulation or packaging change, revision of specifications, or making processes more robust.


Performing a quality review is vital because it enables a better understanding of processes and this can guide further quality improvements. Such a review also serves as a method of continued process verification. The trends observed in the quality review can be an indication of areas of potential risk; thus, this exercise is also a part of the risk management plan of the company that is recommended by ICH guidelines.

Previous Post Next Post