Key Formulation Factors in Oral Controlled Release (OCR) Drug Design

1. Drug Properties


Drug solubility and dose are the most important factors to be considered in the design of ER matrices. In general, the extended-release formulation of an extreme drug solubilities coupled with a high dose is challenging. Drugs with very low solubility (e.g. <0.01 mg/ml) may dissolve slowly and have slow diffusion through the gel layer of a hydrophilic matrix. Therefore, the main mechanism of release would be through erosion of the surface of the hydrated matrix. In these cases, the control over matrix erosion to achieve consistent extended release throughout the GI tract is critical. For drugs with very high-water solubility, the drug dissolves within the gel layer (even with a small amount of free water) and diffuses out into the media. Therefore, it is important to control the factors that affect drug diffusivity (e.g. pH, gel strength and availability of free water) within the gel layer and parameters that ensure integrity of the gel layer after the drug has been dissolved and released from the gel layer. For poorly soluble drugs, the particle size of the drug has a major influence on its release profile. A decrease in particle size of the drug causes an increase in solubility and hence a faster drug release rate.


2. Polymer Considerations


Depending on dosage size and desired release rate, the typical use level can vary from 20 to 50% (w/w). For drugs with high water solubility, there is a threshold level of polymer for achieving controlled release, and further increases in polymer level may not decrease the drug release rate. However, for obtaining a robust formulation with consistent performance and insensitivity to minor variations in raw materials or manufacturing processes, a usage level of 30% (w/w) has been recommended. The particle size of the polymer is also an important factor. The finer the particle size, the faster the rate of hydration of the polymer and hence better the control of drug release. Coarser polymer particles used in a direct compression formulation have been reported to result in faster drug release than finer particles. The course the particle size, the slower the hydration rate and gel layer formation.


3. Presence of Other Excipients


Fillers: Soluble fillers (e.g. lactose), insoluble fillers (e.g. microcrystalline cellulose, dicalcium phosphate) and/or partially soluble fillers (e.g. partially pregelatinized starch). Fillers are generally used in hydrophilic matrices to enhance pharmaco-technical properties of tablets (improve compressibility, flow and mechanical strength) or to modify the drug release profile. The inclusion of fillers affects the dissolution performance of a matrix by a "dilution effect" on the polymer. The magnitude of the effect on the performance of matrices is dependent on the drug, the polymer level and the level of excipient itself. The presence of water-soluble fillers in high concentrations in the matrix leads to faster and greater water uptake by the matrix, resulting in weaker gel strength, higher erosion of the gel layer and therefore faster drug release. Insoluble but weakly swellable fillers, such as microcrystalline cellulose, remain within the gel structure and generally result in decreased release rate. The presence of partially pregelatinized starch, such as Starch 1500®, in HPMC matrices has been reported to decrease the drug release rate. For a highly soluble or sparingly soluble drug, the rank order of release rate was as follows:


Lactose > Microcrystalline cellulose > Partially pregelatinized starch


4. Release Modifiers and Stabilisers


Drugs with pH-dependent aqueous solubility (weak acids or bases) are formulated in HPMC matrices, and they may exhibit pH-dependent drug release. Formulating CR matrices of such drugs may lead to lower drug release due to exposure of the dosage form to increasing pH media of the GI tract (from pH 1.2 to 7). Formulating pH-independent CR matrices for such drugs would not only ensure adequate release throughout the physiological pH range but also lower intra- and inter-patient variability. Development of such pH-independent matrices for weakly basic drugs has been shown with the incorporation of acidic excipients (weak acids or salts of strong acids) that lower the micro-environmental pH within the gel layer and thus maintain high local solubility of the drug independent of the external release media.


5. Effect of Salts and Electrolytes


In general, as the concentration of ions in a polymer solution increases, polymer hydration or solubility decreases. The amount of water available to hydrate the polymer is reduced because more water molecules are required to keep the ions in solution. Moreover, the types of ions in solution affect the polymer hydration to varying degrees. The susceptibility of cellulose ethers to ionic effects follows the lyotropic series of the ions (chloride < tartrate < phosphates and potassium < sodium). Changes in the hydration state of a polymer in solution are manifested primarily by changes in solution viscosity and turbidity or cloud point. At low ionic strengths, the polymer hydration is unaffected, but at higher ionic strengths may lead to a loss of gel integrity of the matrix. The extent of this influence depends on the polymer type and lyotropic series of the ions. The effect of electrolytes or salts is important only in cases where high concentrations of salts or electrolytes are present as tablet components or as constituents of dissolution media. In vivo conditions, however, have fairly low ionic strength (ionic strength of gastrointestinal fluids, 0.01-0.15), to affects the polymer hydration and has a significant impact on the release rate.


6. Characteristics of Dosage Form


Variation in tablet shape and size may cause changes in surface area available for drug release and hence influence drug release profiles from HPMC matrices. A constant surface area to volume ratio (S/V) of different-sized and shaped tablets for an HPMC formulation would lead to similar drug release profiles. The size of the tablet may also dictate the polymer level requirement. Smaller tablets have been reported to require higher polymer content because of their higher surface area to volume ratio and thus shorter diffusion pathways. One technology proposed for modifying the matrix surface area to volume ratio was by physical restriction of the swelling of the hydrophilic matrix by partially coating the matrix with insoluble polymers or multi-layered tablets (Geomatrix® technology).


7. Presence of Coating


Application of film coatings to tablet formulations is a common practice in the pharmaceutical industry. Tablets are coated for a variety of reasons, such as improving the stability of the formulation, taste masking, enhancing the aesthetic appearance, identification and branding, improving the packaging process or modifying the drug release profile. Coating of hydrophilic matrices with water-soluble polymers such as Opadry® or low-viscosity HPMC generally does not alter drug release profiles. Coating with water-insoluble polymers such as ethyl cellulose with or without permeability modifiers (e.g., low viscosity grades of HPMC or Opadry) may be used for modulating the drug release profile from HPMC matrices.

Previous Post Next Post